What’s the evidence that"events are guided by an unseen force"?What’s the evidence that it’s the Christian god?

Posted on September 25th, 2011 by admin in unseen | 11 Comments »

Posted a few minutes ago:

"we do not have the ability to directly sense God, but we can through thorough investigation see that things and events are guided by an unseen force that we have no control over. We cannot describe it, because we cannot sense it. That is why science is useless in proving God’s existence. It is a feeling that exists on another, higher plane of reality"

Decartes argued that conscience and spirit maybe the same thing. but we can’t account for spirit.
And didn’t physicists say there are rules to reality which we now find don’t apply in nano-atomic, and cosmic levels? Even Einstein said there are things we will never be able to account for, and limiting imagination is limiting intelligence.

Do have rights to return unseen goods?

Posted on September 13th, 2011 by admin in cannot unseen | 1 Comment »

I would be really grateful for some advice.. I recently ordered a mirror from Laura Ashley at one of their shops – I was not able to view the mirror as they did not have it in stock. On receiving the mirror I realised that it was far too heavy to hang from my very weak wall (25kgs, not stated in the catalogue) and asked if I could return the item (as I was informed would be possible by the shop assistant). I have since been told that I cannot return this item and am rather annoyed by this (the mirror costing £300). I would have thought that I had legal rights to return an unseen item, but on further investigation, this seems to only be the case if the item was purchased by ‘distance selling’, i..e online, etc. Could anyone let me know if I have any an other rights that may help me out with this?

That all depends on the policies of the merchant. Most are quite liberal about returns. Apparently this one is not. You can try to decline payment through your credit card issuer. They may or may not choose to help you.

Science is unscientific because at critical times it draws conclusion on unseen based on unseen: Isn’t it?

Posted on September 11th, 2011 by admin in cannot unseen | 10 Comments »

The hypothesis and / or assumption of full visibility and / or full knowledge.
As The God willed human scientists, no grudge against them, have discovered a lot of things, which have changed human perceptions on things we see or experience. These scientific discoveries, many of them are in fact accidental, also have easen our lives, as The God willed. Talking about accidental great discovering actually reminds me of The God’s will in our efforts and in their success.

Talking about influence of scientific ideas or tools on things we see, also reminds me of the extent we believe in things, which science has never been able to observe or see; yet science has given its knowledge based on observation of the unseen… One of the examples of limitations of our scientific visibility is like observing the space. What percent of the deep space we can actually see through available scientific devices or tools? I would say if full space is taken as 100, we cannot even see a faction of a percent. So how do we generalise on the 100% based on our visibility of nothing?

Science is about knowledge based on observation. In that regard isn’t it unscientific to draw such conclusions about things, which we cannot really see a substantial part to be able to have generalised knowledge or have a scientific knowledge? I think it would rather scientific to acknowledge the limitation of science in those regards rather than giving the human race an apparent confidence that science is able to solve or explain all problems both seen and unseen or unseeable.

There was a time human used to think that they are at the centre of the universe. Then scientist like Galileo discovered devices, with which human could see a little more than they had previously been able to see. With that slight improvement in human visibility the whole concept of human presence relative to the universe was changed or corrected at that time. But then as we have now come so far away from that time and our visibility has improved so many fold that in fact we have now come to another level of the same situation of Galileo’s time that we are now claiming the same way our high institutions of Galileo’s time used to claim. We are again claiming how rest of the universe look like based on what our eyes can see or observe! The size of the problem has just gone bigger than that of Galileo’s time but essentially it is the same…

We are carried away by the little help scientific knowledge is providing in our daily life. ‘Little’ in the sense of the complete universe problems though ‘Little’ is not that little in relation to our daily life. Recent Katrina and Sendai disasters, on two of the most advanced countries in the world are sufficient to prove how little is our scientific knowledge to deal with The God given forecalls.

The great universe problem I’m referring to are like,
-Did matters already exist or The God alone existed always and He caused the matters to exist.
-Did matters evolve themselves to forms of lives or The God caused matters to transform into lives?
-and so on

Bingo

when science goes from "this is what is" to "This COULD mean"

It has lost it’s foundation

Atheists, what if the reason no one can see God is not that God is hiding somewhere?

Posted on September 8th, 2011 by admin in cannot unseen | 21 Comments »

What if the reason is God is all around and in everything we see around us, what if God is the texture underlying the entire universe. How can you see God? What if the reason for his being unseen is because essentially he cannot be seen in the way you see a rock? What if he’s right in saying that the only way to know he exists is by noticing the incredible organization in the world? What if this is all what faith is about and you\re jst supposed to believe in God by noticing the signs and not by actually seeing him (which is impossible)?

Doesn’t matter how many similar questions you ask…your condescending arguments still are a big , steamy pile of horse manure…

Top 10 Strongest Naruto Characters…?

Posted on September 4th, 2011 by admin in unseen forum | 2 Comments »

So I have seen many forums of peoples opinions about the strongest characters in the Naruto universe, and althought I respect they’re opinions most of them I must reject. My list is not taking into account the current state, illness, or whether they have a Tailed Beast but only how strong they were at their prime. (Including those who are deceased)
1. Sage of the Six Paths. Yes I know he has been dead for many many years however consider the small amount of information about him that we know and the things that he had done while he was alive, it should be obvious why he is at the top.
2. Hashirama Senju. Althought it is still unclear to me why he could control Tailed Beasts in the first place, I have come to learn that he could and considering the tale that he had defeated Madara in battle when Madara was at his prime and had his Eternal Mangekyo Sharingan, he should be somewhere at the top.
3. Madara Uchiha. At his prime, he could control the Nine Tailed Fox (Argueably the most powerful Tailed Beast) and therefore likely could control the others as well. He had the Eternal Mangekyo Sharingan and as far as i’ve heard relatively great mastery over it. I dont know if he can use the Susanoo yet but considering that he can use Izangi i’d say that he should be able to or was able to at some point. Although his weapon choices are stupid, his eyes alone are incredibly powerful.
4. Itachi Uchiha. If you take away his illness I personally think that he could easily fight on equal ground or even defeat both Madara and Hashirama. He may not be able to use it for very long but his Susanoo has the Totsuka Sword and the Yata Mirror, weapons that make him virtually invincible. One touch from the sword alone and you’re toast. I would put him higher on the list, but I dont 100% know what Madara and Hashirama are capable of.
5. Nagato. His chakra level is on a whole other level. Everyone says that Kisame has epic chakra, but Nagato was able to terrorize the leaf Village, kill many villagers, then level 90%, fight Naruto himself, fight the Naruto in his 4 – 8 Tailed form, use a decent size Planetary Devastation, AND bring all the people he had killed back to life. Yes this did kill him, but doing all that on top of the techniques that he uses easily puts him top of the list.
6.Minato Namikaze. Taking into account his speed and his best technique, the Rasengan, a perfect scenario is that he uses his speed to get behind his opponent, tank them with his Rasengan and boom! The fight is done!
7. Jiraiya. In a stats book that I found, Jiraiya is tied for 1st in power with Itachi. Now they dont have very much information about the stats of say Madara or Nagato but considering Jiraiya fought Nagato without knowing what he was capable of, figuring out the secret and then fighting all 6 at once for a good amount of time, on top of the other ninja he had fought and beaten in his life, he is very powerful.
8. Mu (Second Tsuchikage?) Althought not much is know about him, he had enough recognition to be known and summonded by Kabuto many years after he had died. His Technique of walking around virtually unseen is incredible and although I have only heard of few Dust Syle techniques, it is something to be feared.
9. Shisui Uchiha. Again, not much is known but he also did have the Mangekyo Sharingan and could have possibly used Susanoo or Izanagi. He was most known for his technique "Kotoamatsuki" which if he had been like Danzo and somehow got a hold of the first Hokage’s DNA, his powers would be on a different level.
10. Sasuke Uchiha. There probably would be alot of debate on who should be on the list, Naruto or Sasuke but Sasuke still has the Mangekyo Sharigan which in my opinion trumps Sage Mode. If you were to compare the powerful techniques of both, Sasukes Susanoo vs Naruto’s RasenShuriken, i think the Susanoo would triump.

Well, thats my list, please leave a comment of what you think and make any corrections you think should be necessary. Sorry for it being so long, I have many opinions. :)

NOT IN ORDER.

1. Itachi Uchiha
2. Pain/ Nagato
3. Sasuke Uchiha
4. Current Tsuchikage
5. Killer Bee
6. Shisui Uchiha
7. Madara Uchiha
8. Sage Of Six Paths
9. 1st Hokage
10. Minato / 4th Hokage

SPECIAL MENTIONS. Naruto- He has really grown into a threat. well he always been one but now hes getting to a whole different level then he used 2 be. Once he can control the 9 tails cloak w. Sage he will be a monster!

Kabuto- He a threat a powerful one fused w. orochimaru and now apparently gotten stronger. Plus Madara sided with him cuz he was afraid to go against him and ruin his Moon plan.

Jiraya- Legendary Sannin, he was powerful , but i think now Naruto at this point surpassed him. Cuz Jiraya lost to Pain a weakened one at that . Cuz his old body etc. and Naruto beated him. so yeah probably he would deff be top 15 strongest.

We cant really say anything about the revived kage and jinkurruchki cuz like they were at first telling them their movements and we havent really seen anything. usually the villians died at most 2 chapters unless they skipped them 4 the time being. So Mu can be on top 10 but havent seen much. But yeah cant wait 4 more naruto 2 days. hope this helps.

|