it takes repeat reporting to be a reliable member
and it takes reliable members to get deletions
and blocked members cannot report what they cannot see…
but if a member has accounts that are never seen
therefore never blocked
they can see and report

now if a reliable member had their multiple accounts exposed
and then reported the question and the question was deleted

does it not stand to reason

that only the exposed account holder
with additional unseen accounts
that are recognized as reliable members
due to repeat reporting

that this recognized repeat reporter
is the reliable member that reported
the question that exposed the multiple account holder

just sayin’
———-
Deleted Question: Does Yahoo allow you to have multiple accounts?
Violation Reason: Misuse of the question and answer format

…and can someone, anyone…please tell me how , "Does Yahoo allow you to have multiple accounts?" is not a valid question?
————–
and for good measure, the reliable repeat reporter reported this…repeatedly

Deleted Question: where can I find a beach to resort to…c/c?
Violation Reason: Misuse of the question and answer format
tce…I fail to see the hahaha part of your reply
capital idea Willwow…but 30 hp’s…you are cruel…HA…now I am off to Phillie to ring a bell and get skunked on South Street

Well, I’m new here and still learning about all of this cloak & dagger stuff. I only can think of a few reasons why a person would intentionally have someone else’s words deleted.

1-They have a bad case of writer envy
2- They are a spurned lover
3-They are Cujo in human form
So for me if someone chooses to have my stuff reported, feel free. I will post and repost and keep them busy 24×7.

I do have a plan. Your pals here could all open up hp accounts, you send them words to post so there would be like 30 hp accounts posting night & day. The offender will either go slap nuts trying to report or wave the white flag. Just a thought. Petty folks do not sit well with Willow, not at all.

So hp, here is a tune for you, ok?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuULcVaMTf0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tz50_1Y2pXU

WTF!!?? What has been seen cannot be unseen.

That was so creepy!

Talking about influence of scientific ideas or tools on things we see, also reminds me of the extent we believe in things, which science has never been able to observe or see; yet science has given its knowledge based on observation of the unseen… One of the examples of limitations of our scientific visibility is like observing the space. What percent of the deep space we can actually see through available scientific devices or tools? I would say if full space is taken as 100, we cannot even see a faction of a percent. So how do we generalise on the 100% based on our visibility of nothing?

Science is about knowledge based on observation. In that regard isn’t it unscientific to draw such conclusions about things, which we cannot really see a substantial part to be able to have generalised knowledge or have a scientific knowledge? I think it would rather scientific to acknowledge the limitation of science in those regards rather than giving the human race an apparent confidence that science is able to solve or explain all problems both seen and unseen or unseeable.

There was a time human used to think that they are at the centre of the universe. Then scientist like Galileo discovered devices, with which human could see a little more than they had previously been able to see. With that slight improvement in human visibility the whole concept of human presence relative to the universe was changed or corrected at that time. But then as we have now come so far away from that time and our visibility has improved so many fold that in fact we have now come to another level of the same situation of Galileo’s time that we are now claiming the same way our high institutions of Galileo’s time used to claim. We are again claiming how rest of the universe look like based on what our eyes can see or observe! The size of the problem has just gone bigger than that of Galileo’s time but essentially it is the same…

We are carried away by the little help scientific knowledge is providing in our daily life. ‘Little’ in the sense of the complete universe problems though ‘Little’ is not that little in relation to our daily life. Recent Katrina and Sendai disasters, on two of the most advanced countries in the world are sufficient to prove how little is our scientific knowledge to deal with The God given forecalls.

The great universe problem I’m referring to are like,
-Did matters already exist or The God alone existed always and He caused the matters to exist.
-Did matters evolve themselves to forms of lives or The God caused matters to transform into lives?
-and so on

Bingo

when science goes from "this is what is" to "This COULD mean"

It has lost it’s foundation

Does anyone know of any information on what is going on among the unseen women and children of Libya??

Read up on Sharia Law. Women and children are doin what they are told, for fear of gruesome death. They will be sacrificed if necessary to ensure the continued reign of their brutal dictator.

The people who really deserve them (those who do the work tirelessly – not looking for any reward) do their bit unseen therefore are automatically overlooked. The remedy – if you cannot honour them all don’t make exceptions!

It aggravates the sinuses of all them brown-noses.
and delights the magpie minded to see the baubles

I have a better question. How can anyone have a god who slaughters the innocent in anger, then calls anger a sin, and call that god "loving"?